| "Personal Rapid Transit" CPRT's David Gow Gives His Readers a Hotfoot |
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June My Links PRT Skeptic Web Site Personal Rapid Transit – Cyberspace Dream Keeps Colliding With Reality Pulse Article on PRT Dump Bachmann Blog Mpl Upside Down Old PRT Blog TLC's Resolution on PRT Pictorial History of Gadgetbahn Let's Get Real About PRT New York Press on PRT Joshua Frank on PRT Minneapolis Confidential Lloydletta Nooz www.publictransit.us tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog 
|
posted by: PRT_Punk (reply) post date: 11.06.05 (1:14 pm) "..and melting when the pod warmed up... causing all kinds of moisture-related problems." Yes, it's obvious that the designers would not have thought about PRT operating in the rain. *sarcasm off* posted by: newbie (reply) post date: 11.06.05 (1:17 pm) Yawn.....For a skeptic, you still haven't come up with a deal breaker, instead your assinine comments just further marginalize you. http://atsltd.co.uk/media/papers/docs/BAA_ATS_statement.doc posted by: newbie (reply) post date: 11.06.05 (2:35 pm) Bonehead, PRT is not a car. Why blow air at the windows if it is AUTOMATED and you don't need to see out? But warming the air inside will also keep the cabin shell warm enough to keep ice from forming. Let us know when LRT and buses figure out to keep moisture of people breathing from fogging windows and making it generally unpleasant. posted by: DavidGow (reply) post date: 11.06.05 (3:03 pm) You're just jealous that I can design an attractive web page. By the way, just what are you trying to insinuate with your comments about "dubious" news sources? posted by: DavidGow (reply) post date: 11.06.05 (3:14 pm) There's no argument about HVAC. There's only an accusation you have made. Therefore it's up to you to prove it--but so far you've just made stuff up. http://www.kinetic.seattle.wa.us/nxtlevel/prt/seehowmakes.html posted by: KENZ ARMY (reply) post date: 11.07.05 (6:38 am) Haw, haw, haw.... Now Mr. Avidor, why must you poke these poor POD FANATICS in the fanny with a made up problem like HVAC? They hop up and down arguing that the fantasy pod has everything. I hope my FAITH BASED TRANSIT POD has satalite tv and radio. And a shower, and a mint on my POD-PILLOW. But what happens when a drunk throw up into the IMAGINARY HVAC. PEEEEE-UUUUU what an IMAGINARY STINK.... posted by: PRT_Punk (reply) post date: 11.07.05 (12:34 pm) Reply to: KENZ I thought commuters were "friends, family and fellow citizens". Not drunks vomiting in public places. Apparently drunks will only vomit in PRT pods but somehow never do so in buses or LRT. posted by: newbie (reply) post date: 11.07.05 (4:34 pm) Hey PUNK: A drunk will never vomit in the HVAC of a FAITH BASED TRANSIT POD because PRT does not exist! And will not be built! And PRT is laffed out of every RED BLOODED AMERICAN CITY. The North - American POD WAR is OVER. WE HAVE WON! SMOKING SHELLS OF PODS in DENVER, FRIDLEY, CALI, CINCINN, CHI-TOWN, everywhere. Ding Dong the witch is dead, which old witch? The FLYING MONKEY POD WITCH, PUNK! To paraphrase Conan:I CRUSH YOUR PODS, DRIVE THE POD PEOPLE BEFORE ME, AND HEAR THE LAMENTATIONS OF THE STOCKHOLDERS. You Pod-fanatics cannot handle the truth. posted by: newbie (reply) post date: 11.08.05 (12:20 pm) Conan? You mean Ah-nold? Figures you'd quote a Republican. posted by: newbie (reply) post date: 11.22.05 (7:12 pm) Is this your argument from ignorance? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_Ignorance |
|